Sections 8, 12 and 39 of the recovery of possession, the specific performance of the contract and the final discovery of the facts by the two courts under the termination of the sale contract, the recovery of the new court scope suit filed by the plaintiff for the recovery of possession, the specific performance of the contract and The cancellation of the sale contract, as well as the trial court and the lower appellate court, had ruled in their favor by the plaintiff that he was a legal tenant, and therefore, according to law, they could not be dismissed. And could not be granted the jurisdiction exercised by the courts which was exercised by them legally, and was not contrary to any modest, arbitrary or material substance available on record decision and approved by the following courts. The injunction was not subject to any unlawful interference or instability to interfere. Review Request Revision rejected in circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
