Section 20 and 22 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 439 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Criminal Revision Retention Limitation Scope Requesting Review by Judge Banking Court Under Section 20 Financial Matters Was directed against the decision passed in the criminal complaint. (Recovery of Ordinance, 2001, whereby the respondents / accused were acquitted, the applicant failed to file an appeal against an unknown order provided under section 22 of the Ordinance under Section 22 of the Financial Institutions) / The interstate verdict, which has not decided the whole matter, will not lie on any appeal, revision or revision nor will it be against the order of the Banking Court to accept or reject any request for defense or leave while Under section 22 of section 22 every time (1) the financial institution (recovery of finances) Ordinance, 2001, has filed an appeal against the final order within 3 There will be a 0-day financial institution (tax recovery) ordinance, 2001 was a special law and the limitation period for appeal was not set in the ordinance, and under the circumstances the provisions of section 5 of the 1908 did not apply. But if it is amended, it will be adversely affected by the change in any appeal even otherwise, in the presence of the Financial Institutions Section 22 (Financial Recovery) Ordinance 2001, the amendment will be amended in the Constitution. Can't be modified, under similar circumstances the criminal amendment was not applicable. Deprecated, dismissed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
