Section 9 (c), 14 and 15 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 555 FIR, and drug possession to restrain proceedings, the request for record showed that the accused was in any way the alleged offender. There was no compelling evidence against linking. The presence of the accused along with the co-accused, if any, did not, on his own, link him to the alleged crime; the accused's main ray could not be established as the investigation is over and no one has to prove it. Evidence was not collected that he had. Knowledge of the presence of the intoxicant with the co-accused; and the role that they are said to have played by the co-accused in the case is that the co-accused is his co-accused. Section 249A, CCP C is acquitted on the charge of evidentiary evidence and such order was not challenged by the authorities on appeal. The accused faced the same fate and, ultimately, if the proceedings continued, the court would not enable the accused involved in his crime to be sentenced so he could ask for proof of a positive nature. The trial court allowed the filing of the FIR to be filed, and the FIR concluded that the trial was not properly appreciated on the court record. Finish
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
