A.R. KHAN & SONS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED OFFICER versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE, ISLAMABAD
Sections 2 (j), 13 (2) (j) and 21 Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Ordinances (XXII of 2002), Section 5 Public Procurement Rules, 2004, RR 3, 4, 20 and 42 (c) Competitive Commission Ordinance ( XVI of 2010), section 2 (1) (e) (k), 3 and 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 18 and 1991 in the Constitutional application of the Gwadar Port Concession Agreement between the Port of Singapore Authority and Gwadar Port Diversion of cargo imports by Trading Corporation of Pakistan Authority for the construction and development of various port facilities in the Gwadar Port concession area on the basis of BOT (Built, Operate and Transfer) Authority of the Port Authority of Singapore, without the open bidding, steering services and handling facilities The obtained constitutional application challenges this kind of trade. The corporation is excluding the applicant from participating in the trading corporation's provision of services to the Gwadar Port Ply that the Port of Singapore Authority in Gwadar provided only such services, thus, to the Trading Corporation of Port of Singapore Authority As well as the Public Procurement Rules, there was no option but to enter into a direct contract under R42 of 2004, the scope of legitimate privileges did not extend to the entire Gwadar Port, but to a certain part of which the Port was Singapore. ? The Authority had the exclusive right to invest, while the Gwadar Port Authority has the full liberty to develop the remaining part of the Gwadar Port privileges at the Port of Gwadar. Under such agreement, the Port of Singapore Authority may provide such. The deal was not like that. Gwadar requires import of cargo from Trading Corporation, but if
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
