TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF KARACHI versus KARACHI INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER TERMINAL LIMITED
Preamble Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 11 and O. VII, R11 (a) of Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 189 for the collection of wharfage charges received by ships on shore cranes and rubber tire gantry cranes. The plaintiff, requesting the plaintiff to show that the plaintiff did not show any reason for the proceedings, because the Supreme Court had passed the judgment between the parties in the same case in the case that the plaintiff stated. That a review request is pending against this decision. Prior to the correctness of the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court had said in the judgment that it was necessary for the Department of Traffic to provide the port facilities in loading and unloading of goods in appreciation of the gorges included in the Karachi Port Trust Handbook. The goods will not include any down payment. And that such cranes were not exported to the goods, nor were they sending the goods back for return, which was clearly the decision and decision which had already taken place between the parties in the same case. It was decided that this way the judiciary would work as a party between the parties. The trial court, while suspending its original decision under inspection, had impacted the trial court's decision, which could have taken no further action except to dismiss the case, dismissing it with observation. It was found that in the case of a review of the Supreme Court decision, due to the action taken by a plaintiff, he could file a new case.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
