Section 7 (e) Definition of Evidence for Abduction Benefit of Suspicion Mobile telephony by which telephone calls were not available in the name of the alleged abductor in connection with the kidnapping and receiving ransom money Many evidence raised serious doubt that Were there mobile phones with the alleged kidnapper and his spouse, considering the incoming and outgoing calls to such mobile phone numbers, it did not matter but about such evidence of telephone calls. It is said that the house of the alleged abductor's wife has been received or is contradictory on her mobile telephone and she has been arrested for the alleged abduction. The statement of R's wife was not confirmed and could not be relied on securely, which had caused seriousness in the prosecution case due to other important factors and said that the fact of the ransom demand could be established. ? Although presented in court, recorded on a cassette by a tape recorder audio cassette, it was never contested in court, nor did any of the expert witnesses connect the audio recorded to the suspect's voice. There was no evidence, nor did the prosecution witnesses of the alleged kidnapper and prosecution choose to establish this basic controversial evidence in court. Playing the audio cassette and not seeking expert opinion on the investigation, the investigating officer was told that the ransom amount was to be paid 40,000, but he did not take any action to defraud the ransom or prepare an inventory. , Which was necessary to prove that the amount of the ransom recovered from the accused was the same as the wife of the alleged kidnapper, not to do so, to guarantee
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
