KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY versus MUHAMMAD SHAHNAWAZ
Sections 42 and 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 94, OAX Exxon, RR1, 2 and 4 for the Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Intra Court of Appeal Maintenance Efficiency Aid Interim Phase Plaintiff Karachi Electric Supply Company employees and their services were terminated without prior notice. A single High Court judge approved the ad interim injunction in favor of the defendants against the order of termination of the suspended interference at the interim stage, where it was permissible only if justice was found to be abolishing the abortion and Where to interfere temporarily. The ruling was against the principles of arbitrariness, favor and good law. The trial of the plaintiff was not yet pending and the order under appeal was merely an ad hoc order, after the parties' hearing, such an order could be affirmed or dismissed by a single judge. Even OXIXIX, R 4, may dismiss the application under CPC, vary or adjust the intra-judicial High Court Division Bench. The Youth Appeal refrains from expressing its opinion regarding the influence of jurisdictional decisions and legal principles in this context, or the jurisdiction of a single High Court Judge, as the case may be. In phase, this cannot happen. He said that the order passed by a single High Court judge was fake, disobedient or in violation of the law's well-established principles or it could result in abortion of justice which could result in the High Court of High Court. The Divisional Bench of KG refused to interfere with the single judge's interim stay order. Appeal to intra-court appeal of High Court
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
