Section Q Qanun. Evidence of Fake and Fake Documents Documents Trial Court dismissed the case, but the lower appellate court upheld the same justification by merely filing a written statement to defendant. Claimed to be lawful and legal and at the time of its execution claimed to have considered the sale to the plaintiff in connection with the property. The alleged sale agreement and he claimed to have seized the property. The defendant's claim cannot stand the evidence because neither the defendant has testified to prove such a claim nor has he chosen to examine the plaintiff to deny the allegations. ? The court found no error in dismissing the claims of the plaintiffs High Court, under which the lower appellate court's finding of the plaintiffs' claims / plaintiffs claims was based on sound legal principles, and the two courts reportedly But they were claimed by both the courts, even without finding the authenticity of the fake documents. By law, any person deciding the fate of such documents, wishing to proceed with such documents and preparing such documents during the exhibition, after which he can stand the test of evidence as well. It cannot be understood as legal and lawful. The High Court set aside the decisions and orders set forth below the two courts and was allowed to ratify the matter or to review the alleged sale agreement and usually the attorney's amendment.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
