Find a Lawyer

MIRZA MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus STATE

Section 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), 5 489 F / 34 falsely issuing a check guarantee, were behind the principal accused's grant bars. The responsibility was against the co-accused and the accused was merely a guarantor. The prosecution recognized that under Section 9FFF, the crime, PPC, had not been brought out of the facts and circumstances of the case and the police had Detention was no longer needed. The offense under section 948FF is not covered by the prohibited clause of PPC section 7497, CCP can be tried indefinitely and hold the jails behind bars and thereby be sentenced. This is not allowed under. In the case of criminal jurisprudence, entered on bail. r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• ALI SHER v. Mst. RAZIA BEGUM 2010 YLR 2411
• ATIQ-UR-REHMAN v. Mst. RANI 2010 YLR 2421
• KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY v. MUHAMMAD SHAHNAWAZ 2010 YLR 2426
• COMMISSIONER (LEGAL) INLAND REVENUE, L.T.U., KARACHI v. INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION GARMENTS LTD., KARACHI 2010 PTD 2427
• DHANI BUX v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Transport Department 2010 YLR 2460
• ARSHAD PERVEZ v. CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI 2010 YLR 2483
• GHOUS MUNAWWAR v. Mrs. SEEMA TOUFIQ FEROZ 2010 YLR 2489
• ABDUL SATTAR v. CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI 2010 YLR 2505

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

criminal advocate from Abbaspur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes