Section 42 & Cant 54 Cantonment Board Faisal, Karachi, Building By Law, 2008, 2008, Arts 16 and 141 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OLXX, RR1 and 2 of Defendant behind Case 2 Under Construction and Permanent Prohibited Houses This house is allegedly to halt the flow of air and light into the plaintiff's house after the purchase of two plots by the plaintiff for interim injunction against such construction. The plaintiff obtained the combination and after the approval of the building project from the authorized authority, the construction started. And made regular. After receiving a huge fee from the defendant through the cantonment board, all the adjoining plot, including the rear part of the plaintiff's house, was left open on all four sides; the question of stopping the air to fall in the rear of the defendant is not recorded. The plaintiff's request did not support that her property would be obstructed by light and air. Appropriate evidence could prove a plea bargain. There was no case for the injunction by the plaintiff. Such request was excluded in the circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
