The provisions of & & dispossession claim that he was the owner of the underground plot by taking the respondents through the act of law which was his tenant, the applicants alleged that the accused was arrested on the same day. Had broken the lock of the flat. The tenant who was occupied and illegally occupied the flat was dismissed by the trial court, seeking restoration of the possession under sections 3 and 4 of the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005 Did not allow applicants to plead guilty. In this case, the flat-to-party was illegally occupied and no evidence and cross-examination was recorded. There is no restriction in criminal proceedings for the first time in filing the evidence of the complainant and the illegal occupier / accused. It should be found out that when the primary court was tried as a claim, when the court confessed the complaint, it would confess to the crime and it was proposed to file the case against the illegally arrested persons. Depending on the police report and not examining the accused in the illegal trial of Flat Trial Court He had come to the conclusion without having all the equipment, was approved by the designated judge of the trial court trial. The trial court was remanded to decide on the petition of the hearing applicants, who were charged with unlawful possession of the alleged flat and recording its statement.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
