Find a Lawyer

SYED AHSAN ALI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Such offer on behalf of the applicant who has served the company for 20 years under the retirement voluntary separation scheme (VSS) under the Employees Voluntary Separation Scheme (VSS) of Arts 25 and 199 Constitution Petition. Calculate the amount paid to applicants based on their 16 years of service under VSS approval. Such calculation was discriminatory rather than 20 years apart from the applicant's monthly pension amount because the company refused to take into account the 4 years of service due to ad hoc payments, while other employees In this case the ad was placed. For this period such employees were extended the period and privileges which deprived the applicant of accuracy for more than three days, thus avoiding the need for the applicant immediately. The payment required for will be refused. The applicant was discriminated against. Thus, the Constitution was heard by the High Court High Court. The applicant claimed that the balance amount and monthly pension should be paid within one month, otherwise the non-compliance was due. Dardan will attract contempt of court proceedings against the officers.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• Mst. ZARINA FATIMA v. Syed ABDUL MUSSAWWIR SHAH 2010 CLC 661
• ASADULLAH MEMON v. PAKISTAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY (PEPCO) 2010 PLC(CS) 662
• MUHAMMAD ASGHAR v. ABDUL REHMAN 2010 MLD 665
• NAZIR AHMED alias AMIN alias LAMBA v. State 2010 YLR 666
• Mst. NOOR JEHAN v. CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI through District Coordination Officer 2010 CLC 669
• SALMAN IRTIZA v. AHMED MIAN 2010 PCrLJ 672
• MUHAMMAD FAYAZ v. State 2010 YLR 673
• RAJA WEAVING MILLS LIMITED, KARACHI v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARACHI 2010 PTD 674

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

family advocate from Hazro lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes