ZAKI UR REHMAN LAKHWI versus MALIK MUHAMMAD AKRAM AWAN
Section 7/11 F (5) (6) / 11 J / 11 N / 11 V / 21 / 21C Concepts (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34/109 Electronic Crime Prevention (IV of 2008), Section 11/17/19 Passport Act (XX of 1974), Section 6 Foreign Act (XXI of 1946), Section 14 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 164, 540A & 512 Convention Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 43 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Terrorism, murder case, passport-related crime The principal accused was arrested in India as a result of the terrorist attack. On the basis of his earlier statement under Section 160, P.C., the trial magistrate, the present accused and His co-accused was arrested after an investigation in Pakistan; none of the three interim challanes presented by the prosecutor during the trial were shown as the accused or moved as a fugitive request. After the trial by the present accused under section K, K, CR, the PC was dismissed by the trial court in an unlawful order, in which case a confessional statement against any of the accused can be used, But unless a person is accused of it, it cannot be used against his statement. His co-accused, which is the condition presented under Article 43 of Article 1984 of the 1984 Martyrdom Law, that the original accused in section 7373, the CRPC report and the FIR merely mentioning his name Was not shown as an accused, and on the basis of the alleged confessional statement of the magistrate in India, he could not be given the status of co-accused of the present accused but it appears to be technically a trial court but Section 4040.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
