FIR was lodged against unknown persons suspended for Section 426 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302 (b) / 34 Qatl i amd Execution of death. No general account of the incident was available. Was restored only to no avail. In the absence of ocular evidence, Wajitkar's evidence was not an extra-judicial confession offense, no motive was charged, recovery of arms from the accused was legally unforgivable, the Franz Science Laboratory positively reported. In the absence of. The question of whether the accused's conviction and conviction could be retained only on the evidence of Wajitkar was not yet determined by the High Court, but for that time there was no possibility of a central appeal hearing in the near future if the accused. He was acquitted, and will not be compensated in any way for his term in prison. Indefinitely, the High Court can only suspend the death sentence based on the evidence, if the conviction is not based on strong evidence and the accused will be acquitted after the final appeal hearing, the death sentence will be suspended in the circumstances. Gone. And accordingly, he was released on bail
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
