Section Q 42 Laws of Martyrdom (had 1984 of of), Article 64 for the claim of the plaintiff who in her father \ D \ s claim of the plaintiff claims that her father-in-law was unmarried and unmarried According to the plaintiff's first testimony, he saw the defendant's father and D's third motive brother, the second witness of the plaintiff, aged 60/70, said that the \ D wife's The wife's name was not known to him, but when D \ died, he was young, the plaintiff stated that he had expired after the marriage of his three brothers. That the wife of one of his deceased brothers had remarried with the plaintiff's brother and in response to the cross question asked by the defendant, he denied that he had sold his share of the suit in such a manner. The cross-question of will conclude that the plaintiff has always been claiming to be his daughter. The defendant neither examined the defendant in his evidence nor the plaintiff's investigation and his witnesses did not reveal his father's name. The plaintiff did not ask any of the defendant's witnesses that utt D reb. He did not inspect his brother with his suspects. , Who was allegedly married to the widow of the plaintiff's deceased brother. The plaintiff denied the plaintiff's statement regarding her estranged brothers as having sons of DDD's sons, a defendant's witness did not deny the relationship between his wife as ZZ The defendant refused to accept the special affidavit on the Quran in the court at trial, and in the course of the appeal, the plaintiff had neither challenged the plaintiff's show ID card nor the NGS.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
