SHAZIA MUNAWAR versus PUNJAB PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISISON THROUGH SECRETARY, LAHORE
Regulation 11 Punjab Judicial Service Rules, 1994, R7 LA Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Intra Court Appeal Civil Judge's Eligibility Experience with Civil Judges Deadline to submit the prescribed form / advertising history Applied for positions Civil Judges' lower judicial magistrates but their application forms were rejected on the basis that they were not of the required length on the day when the newspaper was endorsed by the Public Service Commission in Spokane for the purpose of selection and appointment. Was. The deadline for submitting the application proposed by law to calculate the experience was such that the principle was chosen on all appointments and appointments where the process for selection was applied by the Punjab Public Service Commission. The important date for the calculation of experience was the deadline for submitting the form and not the ad date being eligible for consideration for appointment because the rejection of civil judges' lower judicial magistrates and their forms / applications was illegal and the law I was not sustainable. The High Court had rejected the order passed by the authorities and was eligible for selection and appointment of the posts held by the appellant. According to its advertisement, the appellant had already completed the process and had passed the examination and was on the merit list, claiming that he was entitled to an appointment. Therefore, the High Court directed the authorities to Appellant should apply for appointment of Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate from next day. Candidates were allowed to apply accordingly as per the procedure put under their advertisement.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
