MUHAMMAD FATEH SHER versus NAZAR HUSSAIN, ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, SAHIWAL
Articles 492, 493, 435 and 439 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/34, the prosecution witness Debbing accused the complainant of being excused from appearing in court and submitting the powers of a public prosecutor, Scope Petitioner / Fried. Has been a witness since. Winned by the accused, allowed to be acquitted Prosecutor's witness said another application was also run by the victim's mother, in which he requested that the request be made because the victim's legal heir The complainant / complainant may be allowed to leave. The trial court dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner / complainant, but allowed the victim's mother's plea to dismiss the complaint, preventing the complainant from appearing in court as a prosecutor's witness. The complainant filed a revision petition against the order. On the other hand, the trial court stated that the Deputy Prosecutor General had been named in charge of the N prosecution when he said, using his legal discretion. The petition and the trial court, in recognition of their discretion, sued the government lawyer He is to be presented formally petition filed by the victim's mother and requested authority. In any case, the court, in its charge, which was subject to inquiry, trial or appeal before any court, and any private lawyer could only prosecute at his direction, the public prosecutor, who was also in charge of withdrawing the case. Can apply for, is under trial trial. In addition to the prosecutor of the provincial government, the case assigned to him
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
