Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Landlord and Tenant, Scope Plaintiffs Relating to Defendants With Regard to Residential Premises The Rental Controller Appeal Court also dismissed the appeal. The defendant claimed that the residence itself was built on state land and he had never made atonement as a tenant under the plaintiff's Centenary Record and the Department's Excise and Taxation documents to establish this relationship. Can't be conclusive proof. Landlords and tenants but at the same time, they were not entirely irrelevant to the indication of ownership and payment of at least the Property Tax Pt1 form. As the property owner, the plaintiff's name clearly indicates that the documents available on record have been clearly excluded. Defendant's claim as the owner of the property when he appeared as a witness in the Al-Magistrate's Court acknowledged his tenancy and that the document was part of the court record and his certified copy was rent-controlled. As well as the Court of Appeal, it was found, in fact and legally, that the evidence was faulty due to misreading and non-reading and consequently, there were substantial legal errors which could not be sustained by the High Court. The constitutional petition was allowed and the decision of the tenant controller and the appellate court were kept with the defendant as directed. Within two months from the date of the order to hand over the disputed premises to the plaintiff, the High Court further stated that the defendant was a tenant under the plaintiff but since he had leased it under his tenancy.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
