ZAFAR IQBAL MALIK versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION LILLA
Article 9379/111111 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Theft and Receipt of Property Theft The removal of the FIR request for the Revenue Record available on the Constitution Petition Record shows that the applicants were partners in the disputed land. , But `house farming 'had their names. Prima facie was not mentioned, the complainant alleged that when the applicants and other accomplices were armed with deadly weapons, the complainant cut down trees from the land near the party, if such allegations were of any importance to them. Accepted accordingly, then the same family commission revealed that some of the recognizable offenses besides the crimes mentioned in the FIR police, in these circumstances, they had no choice, but the applicant and the abusive FIR This is in fact a violation of the FIR allegations leveled against his co-accused. They were and the applicant's denial of such allegations submitted by the counsel of the applicant must also be conducted in the investigation of the dispute. The question regarding the facts is whether the proceedings under Article 199 of the Constitution were dealt with by the High Court. No such exercise could be done, but the FIR was in the investigation stage. It was the legal responsibility of the police to investigate any crime that came to them and the High Court would not like to stop or restrain the aforementioned duty of the police at a premature stage, apart from taking advantage of constitutional treatment. There was also a substitute option for the applicants. After submitting the challan, apply under section 249A, CCPC or the jurisdiction of the competent court
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
