Article 399/402 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Preparation and Submission for the Purpose of Duty The Court had no touchstone to read in the mind of the accused that he was going to commit the crime. The prosecution of an accused for the commission of a crime can only be determined by the actions taken before the commission of the crime, how readily the complainant was able to read the minds of the accused that he was to commit the robbery. The law did not convict the perpetrator of the crime, unless he took some positive steps towards the commission of the crime, as there was a possibility of a change in the mentality of the FI at a later stage. R, even if his action is allowed, one cannot expect that the accused will be punished and all this The practice will be merely a misuse of the law process and the court wasted time wasted accordingly.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
