MST. SHAHNAZ BEGUM ALIAS SHAHNAZ AKHTAR versus MST. ZAHIDA SAIF
Articles 132, 133 and 134 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Applicants Re-Examination of Witnesses Applicants were respondents to the case in which some witnesses were examined by the defendants, to examine witnesses. Moved the request for re-examination, which was rejected by the trial court and the revocation order has been retained by the petitioner's lawyer, as all other matters have been consolidated. In this context, the evidence, which was presented by the defendants, must be present. Disclaimer; and this will also be done through a cross-examination process. Accordingly, when the respondent's lawyer's statement came on record, the deputation of witnesses will not be used against the applicants, for all intents and purposes, as stated above. The statements were, as far as the applicants were concerned and there was no concern for the rights and litigation, there was no case for interference with the constitutional jurisdiction. The constitutional application was dismissed. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
