ABDUL RASHID ANSARI versus JAZZ MOBILINK CO. THROUGH DIRECTOR ENGINEER
Sections 42 and 54 sought the injunction against the plaintiff, claiming that he claimed to be the owner of the suit property, lifting the tower against the defendants, which the defendants opposed. , He was dismissed by the trial court and filed an appeal against the decision of the trial court, the plaintiff was dismissed by the Court of Appeal. The validity record shows that several previous cases were heard between the parties, while the plaintiff raised the same claim in respect of the same property on the basis, and finally the court concluded that the plaintiff was in dispute. No property rights. It was based on the judgment of the Supreme Court that the trial court had dismissed the decision-making case in the appeal. An attempt was made to resolve the dispute. Recently, the Supreme Court suit was decided by the appellant. But it was rejected. There can be no exception to the offensive decisions and orders approved by the following two courts.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
