Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ADNAN versus DR. BASHIR AHMED

Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), A XXXX, Rr 1 and 2 The applicant for a temporary injunction for the specific performance of the contract was in possession of the property in dispute and the sale agreement on record, clearly But it was shown that when all the money was paid when the claimant was in possession of the property in the dispute, then certainly a first case had to happen and the balance would have to be irreparable if the plaintiff was acquitted. Yes, there is no jurisdiction in this regard. There was an error in inviting the High Court's amended jurisdiction

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MUHAMMAD ANWAR v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2010 MLD 741
• SAUDI PAK COMMERCIAL BANK LTD v. UMAR BILAL (PVT.) LTD 2010 CLD 741
• IJAZ AHMAD KAMRAN v. Mst. ZUBAIDA BIBI 2010 CLC 742
• JAMAL DIN v. MUHAMMAD ISHAQ 2010 MLD 743
• GHULAM ABBAS v. EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (HEALTH), GUJRAT 2010 PLC(CS) 744
• MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM v. DIL MORE 2010 CLC 746
• MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ v. State 2010 PCrLJ 746
• SUMERA YASMIN v. D.C.O. 2010 PLC(CS) 746

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

how to become a advocate from Toru lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes