Section 2 302 (b) definition of evidence of conviction, reduction of conviction / witness case, even though it was closely related to the victim, had no enmity or strong motive that the accused in such case. Falsely implicated The matter was an unusual occurrence when the complainant reasonably explained his presence at the time of the incident and there was no reason to refuse his statement even though his presence was not disputed by the defense as he Was the resident of the house in which the incident occurred. Took place The complainant had reaffirmed the story given in the FIR and nothing could be removed from his testimony, yet he was examined, the second witness of the prosecution remained firm on all the material details of the case and his Yet the defense cannot move anything from its testimony. The cross-examination at which he was subjected to a trial said that the witness confirmed the witness's statement on the main points, although he was also related to the complainant and the deceased, but falsely accused him with the accused. He had no enmity with her. He had reasonably proved his presence at the scene that he witnessed the incident when he was from the same place where the incident took place. His testimony was credible. The ocular account confirmed the medical evidence presented by the doctor, who performed a post-mortem examination on the body of the deceased, at the time of the FIR incident, the incident mentioned by the doctor, the accused accused of each other. It is estimated that thirteen persons were injured on the deceased person with a stick but he was not bleeding, however, he recovered.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
