Find a Lawyer

SHAHBAZ ALI versus FAREEDA KHANUM

Article 199 Dismissal of Constitutional Request for Illegal Prosecution Application for Request for Reinstatement Only support for request for restoration of the application was supported by stating that his lawyer had left for higher education abroad. No date was given for the applicant who claimed that he was unaware of the expulsion and such dismissal was disclosed to the court of the petitioner when the petitioner rejected the order. There is no exact date for such information provided by the lawyer for the copy defendant when disclosed Or went, when the applicant learned of the dismissal of the petition that the applicant was not at fault in pursuing the case and that the conduct of the applicant had appeared negligent, providing a valid reason for the delay in the petition. Was not done Moving the Request for Application Maintenance No Reasonable Ground Shown to Show Delays, Deletions

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• AHMAD BAKHSH v. MAKHAN KHAN 2010 MLD 1005
• MUHAMMAD ATTIQUE v. SHAFAIT ALI SHEIKH 2010 CLC 1006
• ZAFAR GULZAR v. S.S.P. Special Branch 2010 MLD 1012
• NASCO PACKAGING (PVT.) LTD. v. Sheikh INAM-UL-HAQ 2010 CLD 1014
• MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MULTAN through Director-General v. HAQ NAWAZ 2010 YLR 1017
• NAZAR HUSSAIN v. FAZAL ELLAHI 2010 CLC 1018
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. State 2010 MLD 1020
• MUZAMMAL AHMED KHAN v. IMRAN MEER 2010 PLC(CS) 1023

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

best law firms from Shamsabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes