MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MULTAN THROUGH DIRECTOR-GENERAL versus HAQ NAWAZ
Sections 18 and 54 Appeal for Land Acquisition Landlords are required by Section 27 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, before the Referee Court, to increase the land compensation rate obtained by the authorities for the construction of bypasses for public acquisition. Filed under References The landlord asserts that the acquiring / acquiring agency is the beneficiary of the acquired land and has no right to file a reference against the Luxury Standards Award or under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act Appeals against reference-based decision. , 1894 The beneficiary of the acquired land had no right to challenge the compensation paid by the competent court authority or the company to the owners of the land from which the collector acquired the land. There was no right to file. Under Article 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1984, the NGO's authority was leased against the decision arising out of the reference, which contradicted the evidence and the referee court considered the evidence supported by the parties. Upon doing so, it had rightly increased the rate of land acquired by the authority, dismissed by the Appellate High Court.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
