MUHAMMAD JAVED IQBAL versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MULTAN
Article 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Suite for the recovery of the allowance by the plaintiff for himself and his three minor children, the family court paid Rs. 3,000 monthly and Rs. 2000 for the plaintiff. The judgment and order of each minor court by the Family Court upheld the judgment fixed by the appellate court, the defendant's judgment tention was that the restitution allowance is fixed by the following courts, Excessive and excessive and extraordinary by the defendant, the defendant belonging to the subordinate working-class was separated from all three young children. Failure to indicate any illegality, irregularity or fault of any jurisdiction in the mutual inquiry of the two courts as the father could not deny the rehabilitation of his children. And pay the money fixed by the two courts below, which was not harsh and excessive in those days, but considering the rise in daily commodity prices, the Italic value was down to the discovery of the two courts. The constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court was not disturbed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
