MUHAMMAD SALIM versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SHEIKHUPURA
Section Constitution42 Constitution Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petitioner sued for specific performance of contract for sale in respect of disputed property, Special Power of Attorney and General Power of Attorney on stopup suit. Ali's representative contested. Another representative of the accused also fought the Special Powers Attorney's case and engaged with the lawyer and the plaintiff wants to file a written statement from the trial court, which rejected the Special Powers Attorney's request. The trial court was also dismissed. The Special Power of Attorney was not properly executed and was the same as the unregistered document, there was hardly any valid authority in favor of the holder, without valid identification of the document. Notary Public did. The executioner who had to make such an identification did not sign the holder's general signature which was a registered document and nothing was kept on the record to suggest that the prosecutor ever did. It is rejected or canceled or disputed. The registered document is still in the currency and will remain valid until it is canceled. In the absence of principal verification and without proper investigation, the holder of the exclusive jurisdiction cannot be treated as the defendant's authorized agent, nor is he entitled to be enforced by any law from which he has been appointed by the High Court. To file such a constitutional application before High Court denies interference with constitutional petition
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
