Attempts to commit Section 242424 murder The testimony of the evidence was mysterious, according to his wish the prosecutor was trying to change it, but despite the incident, the suspect's house was not likely to be located. can go. The incident occurred in the dark hours of the night, the prosecution failed to establish a source of light on the spot, an FIR was filed after consultation and consideration, Section 234 Cr, CrPC The statement below was not put before the accused, it may be that the principal accused who was held responsible for the murder of the deceased was acquitted by the trial court and his acquittal by the complainant. Was not challenged, and the said principal suspect was given the benefit of the doubt, which was declared a fatal role. Through eyewitness testimony, it must be extended to the present accused, the deliberate and dishonest correction of eyewitnesses who were closely ignored. Nokia, the prosecution's case for the deceased, was raised with a suspicious mind about the defendant's guilt, taking advantage of a single situation, not as a matter of favor or privilege, but a case of the accused. Should be given as Was acquitted of circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
