AHMAD HAYAT versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SARGODHA
Article 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of the minor In the hearing of the petition for the custody of the minor, the applicant submitted that if the monthly visit schedule was issued by the court, it would be a minor trial. Will withdraw your request for The court, dismissing the petitioner's request, dismissed the applicant under section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, upon filing an appeal against the decision of the trial, the appellate court observed that the minor An application for detention was initiated illegally. Applicant and denying the petition remand, saying that in the de novo trial, it had the least probability of success and requested the applicant to withdraw the central request with permission to file a new application. The permitted Guardian Judge did not decide the matter. Regarding the parties whether the application for the custody of the minor was filed by an unauthorized person, Observito, the applicant once again reiterated his offer that the custody of the minor if the visitation schedule was given by the Guardian Court. I will withdraw the key request to have him now permanently residing in Pakistan. And the case was remanded to the Guardian Court, which directed that the application be made to schedule a first visit and then to re-decide on the main application after giving the parties an opportunity to guide their evidence.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
