Find a Lawyer

NAVEED AKHTAR GILLANI versus DIRECTOR, NFC INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGICAL TRAINING P.O. FERTILIZER PROJECT, MULTAN

Article 199 Constitutional Application Academic Entrance Proves Correct The application of proof petitioners for admission to the BB degree course was not violated on the basis that the institute had changed the annual examination system from the semester system to the new scheme. In the past, the exemption was being allowed as the applicant believed that he had joined the B Tech pass course, in view of the current policy he would be entitled to join the BC Course issued by the Institute. Change. Due to the policy provided by the institute, he was deprived of his right to attend the course in the third semester (second year). Jajit Pakistan Engineering Council told the institute that candidates who passed B Tech Stop the discounting process. And the B Tech Honors course if the Pakistan Engineering Council had decided not to equate the applicant's qualifications with the first two semesters of the degree, it did not violate any of the applicant's entitlement to dismiss the constitutional petition. Gone \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• ALLAH WASAYA v. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT 2010 CLC 1104
• Dr. IBRAR AYAZ RAJA v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2010 YLR 1105
• BASHIR AHMAD v. State 2010 MLD 1106
• ZULFIQAR v. Mst. TASMINA BIBI 2010 CLC 1108
• RIAZ AHMAD KHAN v. DISTRICT ACCOUNTS OFFICER, RAHIM YAR KHAN 2010 PLC(CS) 1109
• GHULAM DASTAGEER v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, GOJRA, TOBA TEK SINGH 2010 YLR 1113
• AHMAD HUSSAIN BUTT v. ROBINA 2010 CLC 1115
• Dr. KHALID AZIZ v. MUDASSAR ALI 2010 PCrLJ 1117

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

registration advocate from Charsada lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes