Find a Lawyer

GHULAM DASTAGEER versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, GOJRA, TOBA TEK SINGH

Section 5 of the Constitution and Schedule to the Constitution (1973), Article 199 increased the plaintiff's rehabilitation allowance and the recovery of dowry articles and a restitution allowance for her minor children, a trial trial court ruled. The verdict was awarded to the husband and his wife for up to Rs 2,000 per month. Responding to the completion of the tenure period and raising the minor to Rs 1,000 per head per month, the appellant emphasized that rehabilitation of minors is more than necessary. And it should be reduced to Rs 1000 per month The minor was justified in taking care of his children The care in this question could not be known as excessive as the above amount would barely cover the expenses of the children. He was neither misguided nor the High Court refused to interfere in the constitutional petition. Court dismisses

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• BASHIR AHMAD v. State 2010 MLD 1106
• ZULFIQAR v. Mst. TASMINA BIBI 2010 CLC 1108
• NAVEED AKHTAR GILLANI v. DIRECTOR, NFC INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGICAL TRAINING P.O. FERTILIZER PROJECT, MULTAN 2010 YLR 1108
• RIAZ AHMAD KHAN v. DISTRICT ACCOUNTS OFFICER, RAHIM YAR KHAN 2010 PLC(CS) 1109
• AHMAD HUSSAIN BUTT v. ROBINA 2010 CLC 1115
• Dr. KHALID AZIZ v. MUDASSAR ALI 2010 PCrLJ 1117
• MUHAMMAD AKMAL v. State 2010 YLR 1117
• Mst. KOUSAR BIBI v. MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ 2010 YLR 1118

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

advocates from Depal Pur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes