Section 2 (2 (b) / Q 34) complimented the evidence and filed a complaint after more than five hours in filing an FIR, after the debates and debates the complainant recorded in his statement dishonesty Reform - strengthen the prosecution's case Material contradictions in the witnesses' statements made their testimony extremely dubious, which led to eyewitness claims that the defendant was in a room of his house At about 4 am, in the morning, there was no light or electricity in the aforementioned room, nor was it The site's plan was neither supported nor the circumstances of this case, including the medical evidence prosecutor's story was credible from its inception to the end, nor were the accusers acquitted.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
