Section 13 (3) of the Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 challenged the High Court's Single Bench decision on the basis that the Exam Rules, 2007 had a minimum grade cumulative grade point average of th Was enforced under the threshold. The University Syndicate on 16 2 2008, when the first semester examination was completed on 2 2 2008, the rules and regulations were imposed on the first semester of the appellant as pre-requisite for admission in the following semester. Rules and regulations may be affected. Regular contention was raised by the University against the examination students that the Examination Rules, 2007 were compiled competently and accepted by the appellant and that the students had no right to be concerned with the University's examination standards. Could not have been on which the appellant had waived his objections. The rules for the new exams were not trivial as the applicant had no choice in the matter. The next semester was the last semester which was being offered for the course. The university should arrange for the examination to take place in its subjects. It has been lacking in accordance with university standards and will be available for each probation semester's exams. However, the collective examination of all probationary subjects in 3 semesters, if the applicant passes the semester examinations which qualify him / her to pass the same or similar course in another university. Admittedly, however, the appellant was unsuccessful for one or more semesters then he had no right to complain.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
