Section 302/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), special leave for appeal 417 (2), was denied by the trial court on the refusal of the accused, while the private complaint filed by the complainant under a defective judgment. The prosecution's case was reinstated by the dismissal. Only last seen evidence and additional point: Although the accused's judicial confession was filed fifteen days after the FIR occurred, it is not mentioned that the prosecutor's witness had ever seen the accused in the patient's companionship. Or that the prosecution witness testified to the complainant about the last time the evidence was substantiated after the trial was registered while allegedly standing by the suspect in front of the deceased's close relatives. The reasoning was not appealed, especially when witnesses did not try to apprehend the accused Such evidence can easily be falsified if the relative was killed. The absence of the evidence was last seen before the filing of the private complaint and the evidence of additional judicial confession was introduced because the private complaint. Counseling and pre-meditation was filed as one stained evidence could not confirm the other stained evidence. During the investigation and nothing was recovered from them, the reasons for acquiring the accused were based on reasons which were neither abusive nor the special leave of serious appeal was denied to the complainant in the circumstances and so on. Subject was excluded according to.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
