Find a Lawyer

AMJAD ALI versus STATE

An attempt to approve the arrest warrant after section 497 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), section 324/34 337 F (iii), was filed by the defendant's grievance for a cross version, in which the complaining party Was called who did not fire repeatedly. The injury is attributed to the accused under the Medico Legal Report, it is under Section 7337F (III), the Code of Conduct, 1860 and has been sentenced to three years in prison, for the last ten months. Was behind bars.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• AL-SIDDIQUE OIL AND RICE MILLS through Sole Proprietor v. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF PRISONS, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2010 CLC 1627
• RAHAT JAVAID v. DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, NANKANA SAHIB 2010 PCrLJ 1629
• MUHAMMAD SAEED v. State 2010 MLD 1633
• NASIR MAHMOOD v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1637
• Mst. ALLAH WASAI v. MANZOOR HUSSAIN 2010 MLD 1638
• JAMAL-UD-DIN v. JAMAT ALI 2010 YLR 1640
• RANG ILLAHI v. BORDER AREA COMMITTEE 2010 YLR 1641
• FAISAL NAWAZ v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1644

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

pakistani advocates FR DI Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes