Section 3 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), the acquisition of the accused / applicants during the Section 265 K illegal settlement trial, the applicant's denial allegedly purchased a plot in his possession in 1989 and That's what they were using. Since for the past twenty years, the respondent regarding the excuse of livestock filed a private complaint against the applicants for illegally relocating from the said plot upon receipt of the report from the police and the tehsildar, the applicants were given Section 265 K, CR. The petitioners filed under the PC sought to face trial. And claimed that he had purchased the contentious plot and was the owner of the judgment and order under which the accuracy of the police and revenue officers presented by the police and revenue officials at the trial. The reports were termed vague and sketchy. Therefore, it was not helpful to know whether the plot was claimed by the complainant / respondents with specific specification describing the practical difficulties of the plot in resolving the dispute through plot delimitation in the said plot. Was done because neither the accused nor the complainant have received any documents related to their claimant plots which were acquitted before being recorded. He did not demand any interference until the dispute regarding ownership of the disputed plot was resolved by the trial court after finding out the truth of the allegations made by the complainant's designated order.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
