Find a Lawyer

JAMAL-UD-DIN versus JAMAT ALI

Section 24 and 115 Applicant's Request for Transfer of Review Request from District Headquarters to District Headquarters G Plyes: He was a resident of Tehsil G, where the land is also in dispute. And that the tehsil ji was created after the filing of the amendment to the district headquarters accuracy suit, from which the review was decided by the civil court at the civil headquarters, where it was about 3/2 months ago. The same was filed by the applicants themselves. Long before the review was filed at the district headquarters, the respondent had threatened some threats from the applicant to go to the Tehsil Headquarters G High Court but dismissed the transfer request in the circumstances.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MUHAMMAD SAEED v. State 2010 MLD 1633
• NASIR MAHMOOD v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1637
• AMJAD ALI v. State 2010 YLR 1638
• Mst. ALLAH WASAI v. MANZOOR HUSSAIN 2010 MLD 1638
• RANG ILLAHI v. BORDER AREA COMMITTEE 2010 YLR 1641
• FAISAL NAWAZ v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1644
• FARHAT ABBAS SHAH v. KHUDA BAKHSH 2010 MLD 1644
• ALTAF HUSSAIN alias MUSHTAQ AHMED v. MUHAMMAD DIN 2010 CLC 1646

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

jobs for fresh advocates from Matiari lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes