Find a Lawyer

MUMTAZ ALI versus F. G. E. H. F

Article 199 Constitution Petitioners Applicants, government employees, applied for allotment in the federal government-initiated housing scheme in which government employees were allotted applicants against the age-old criteria, such as brochures from the federal government. Is set in accordance with the terms and conditions of Government employees were given priority by easing the rules for services rendered in the acquisition of scheme land - Accuracy Respondents / Government committed serious breach of the standard of seniority in brochure respondents Was - in the argument that junior government employees were also included in the scheme land acquisition scheme for their services was misunderstood government employees were paid by the state for their services to government employees. The claim that their services were being reimbursed for acquisition of land was unacceptable by the respondents / government. The rruayy ugly and unhealthy example set by ts advised to consider the re-allocation made on the merit. Constitutional application was allowed. \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• RIAZ AHMED v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE 2010 YLR 1657
• Mian ABDUL JABBAR v. LATIF SHAH 2010 CLC 1660
• RESIDENTS WELFARE SOCIETY, SECTOR G-13, ISLAMABAD v. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES\' HOUSING FOUNDATION 2010 CLC 1663
• WAHEED GUL v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1663
• KAMRAN HANIF v. BILQEES BANO 2010 YLR 1665
• ARSHAD MAHMOOD v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1668
• MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE v. State 2010 YLR 1672
• LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR v. Mst. MASHALLAH BEGUM 2010 MLD 1673

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

female advocates from Sambrial lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes