Section 2302 (b) Appraisal of evidence The case of the prosecution only survived when the prosecutor testified about the last time he was seen alive with the accused, shortly after the body was discovered. Did not About the victim, nor did he disclose the fact to the complainant when he went to the witness's house that he stated so in order to save his own son and relied on his evidence. There was no motivation which led to the extra-judicial confession. The accused was presented by a close relative of the complainant and contradicted the material. Extra-judicial confession is always of the weakest type so it must be carefully examined and if found to be reliable and reliable only, which does not have such capability. The current case record does not indicate that the accused had taken the place of the deceased and that, therefore, he had no special knowledge of the whereabouts of the accused. The illicit relationship between the two accused was not established by the record. And it could not be estimated that the deceased was killed on the account that the joint rehabilitation of the wire was not recognized by law as an example of the accused, the accused was acquitted in circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
