Article 199 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 561 A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 440/506 B / 447/447/447 / H (ii) / 148/149 Constitutional Request for Corruption and its Termination Order The respondent had the said order under the questioning order passed in the review by the session judge by which he has confirmed the order passed by the respondent seeking the magistrate in the complaint filed by him, the plaintiff / complainant. Two witnesses, including the complainant, were examined, statements of witnesses indicated that the respondent was the first person / victim of the complainant and other attackers, resulting in the complaint being returned to the complainant's crops. The complainant filed a private complaint and the proceedings initiated under section 56161A, CRPC, cannot be called an abuse of court process. The petitioner read with the applicant's Article 199 and was not summoned by the magistrate to face the case when he did not consider the facts of the case. Just because the magistrate did not give detailed reasons for seeking the accused / applicants, it cannot be concluded that the magistrate did not object to the facts of the case in any way in the advocate council for the applicants. Was found to be illegal or to indicate material misconduct. Unacceptable orders by the following courts. Nor did he prove that the disapproval orders were approved without legal authority.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
