Sections 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 420, 468 and 471 of fraud and forgery, grant of the defendant who was a property dealer, were charged with selling the plot exclusively by a person. Which, upon verification by the complainant, was not exclusively owned by the person who was alleged to be the property dealer, the transaction was not directly beneficial to the record and as such Certified by the lawyer of the complainant, from time to time the accused allegedly paid the complainant because all the evidence was in the form of documents Since the police were in custody, the police did not require the applicant for further investigation or the crime with which the accused was charged did not come under prohibition. The section 497 clause, which delayed the filing of an FIR of almost two years by the CCPC, did not specify that the complainant was capable of accepting bail after the arrest of the case, it was admitted on bail, in situations \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
