Section 17 (2) (i) and 24 were dismissed by the rent controller's appeal against the rent controller's decision to remove the tenant collectively, the landlord claimed that the rent for the place was 5, 000 is monthly. However, under the rent controller's order, temporary rent is fixed at Rs 4,000 per month and the tenant is instructed to deposit Rs 1,12,000 as arrears before 1212 2001 and every month. Also submit the 5th monthly rent, but the tenant did not submit an affidavit on the landlord's lawyer's due date stating that the rent was not paid, dismissing the landlord's initial attack. Will And it was for the tenant to prove that he actually paid the rent. The tenant alleged that he had already paid Rs 1 lakh on 30 months rent to the landlord, but he could not prove it by offering a receipt. The tenant devised the same as an excuse for non-payment of rent; in the circumstances, he was negligent, pure and simple, but the tenant had failed to appreciate the evidence in its true context, rent. Outcomes filed by the controller were not stable; on the contrary, the circumstances in which the landlord's application for a qualified eviction was accepted with costs and the tenant had to pay the landlord within two months. Was directed to provide an empty possession.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
