ABDUL MAJEED versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, LAYYAH
Section 42 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 172 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), Sections 11 and O VII, R 11 Declaration of jurisdiction from the civil court bar jurisdiction jurisdiction jurisdiction applicable In either case, the former injunction was passed in favor of the plaintiffs, and their names were exchanged underground with the defendants on the request of the fraudsters before the Revenue Authorities for this change. The accusation was made, and when the Provincial Board of Revenue decided the matter in their favor, the defendants again filed a declaration. The case, which was dismissed by the trial court on the ground that a decree had already been passed in favor of the plaintiffs with respect to the suit land and the jurisdiction of the plaintiff court, was granted under section 172 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 The ban was imposed so that the civil court's jurisdiction for wrongful correction could not be excluded from recording or registering revenue only by the operation of section 172, West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967. The Royal Court was barred only in respect of matters or actions which were assigned to the Revenue Court due to its weight in connection with the trial, that the plaintiff had a prior injunction in his favor and a second trial for the same purpose. There was no justification for filing law. The action trial court was also impressed by the impression that the revenue record was corrected by the Revenue Record and was not available to the Civil Court even after the Board of Revenue's jurisdictional decision on which the plaintiffs were not appropriate and the plaintiff could not be. Were. O. VIII, R11, CP
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
