Section 9 (c) drug conviction testimony, lack of prosecution witnesses fully supported the prosecution's case, the prosecutor's testimony, which was investigated, successfully recovered the answers. Answered questions about As far as the presence of the accused on the spot and the recovery of 12 kilograms of marijuana from the car robbery, the time, place and manner in which the accused was consulted was recovered. Identify any material contradictions in which the court deemed that the recovery of the narcotic goods and the presence of the accused were not established on the occasion or that any witnesses of the prosecution had no great hostility in making false allegations in the case. The quantity of marijuana said to them that the recovery was fully supported by the Chemical Examiner's port, which was positive and available on record, had failed to produce any ashes in the prosecutor's version for the accused even if Even if it was done by an unqualified police officer, it cannot be challenged during the trial pursuant to Section 156 (2). ), The CR suspect failed to disclose how he was prejudiced at the trial by the complainant / police official who filed the case against the accused, however, it is known It was reported that the samples were not taken from each slab with a 10 gram weight band that was allegedly isolated and not from each packet, not from the entire prohibition, in the circumstances, subject to the total prohibition and the provisions of Section 9 (c). Cannot be punished with ) The Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act, 1997, will not attract the case to life imprisonment
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
