The effect of the Section 42 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), the sale of signatures for the plaintiff's declaration signatures was filed to state that he was the owner of the disputed land and that the defendant had no right to respond to it. Was not, the trial court dismissed. The Court of Appeal allowed the plaintiff's appeal filed by the plaintiff, which was granted by the defendant, that the sale proceedings were proved by trivial witnesses, who confessed their signatures, but the appellate court stayed the trial. Judgment and Order were set aside. The court, without any logical grounds and the appellate court was affected by a wrong settlement which was not available on the record, the plaintiff failed to fail its trial decision badly while the trial court's reasonable decision was upheld. Was that the sales process was implemented. During the year 1976 and the same was added to the Revenue Record in the year 2000 which was under section 42 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967. Registered Authority for registration and certification to the relevant Revenue Authority for admission and certification. The registry is obliged to send send. Where the mutation or transfer did not introduce a registration process for the mutation registration, it was assumed by the Revenue Authority that it was appropriate in the Revenue Record sent directly to the Registration Authority by the Authority Purchase Registry. Enter the mutation. The witnesses acknowledged their signatures on the sale agreement, and after admitting the signatures, the appellate court set aside the trial court's reasonable conclusions.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
