MUHAMMAD MANSHA versus MEMBER/CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER
Section 3 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Land Auction Extra Institutional Impact The applicant's complaint was that he was the highest bidder but the authorities had to respond to the defendant on the basis of some additional institutional effect. Allotted land for After examining the record, it was decided that the property should be auctioned, the authorities had no jurisdiction to advertise in the manner of action for the benefit of the respondents that the executive ligament faced persecution by the public. He was always present in law courts. Judicial behavior should not be expected to be a matter of factual issues and their disputes should not be decided on external considerations or on the recommendations of persons who have some authority or influence to operate the system. Has perished and the stream of justice will not be allowed to flow. Unable to extra-institutional influence, our respondents exceeded the jurisdiction to act under the command of the Army Youth, without legal authorization passed by the authorities in favor of the respondents. That was, without any legal influence and the original decision was taken in favor of the applicant in the auction proceedings. Retained and the applicant was declared the owner of the underground land under which the petition was allowed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
