Section 497 (2) Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 324/452/148/149 murder of Amjad and attempt to commit a domestic offense; further investigation into the accused was not part of the body of the firearm. There was no repeat of the fire by the complainant's spouse and the suspected accomplices, who complained of the firearms to the complainant and others were guaranteed that they were observed to have fired shots at the victims. Were not in the important part and did not repeat. That is why the reasons were consistent with the consistency of the accused in the case of the accused, in the circumstances the FIR statement did not clearly indicate that the accused had caused two injuries to the complainant's wife. Why was it Various responsibilities of the accused were to be imposed in the proceedings under section 2452; PPC was not included in the prohibition clause of section 7497 (1), although the CCP rifle was shown to have been recovered from the accused. , But no cracks were found from the premises, questions regarding the accused's guilt, certainly more investigations or investigations were demanded in this case, in the circumstances of the misconduct of section 497 (2), CCP The defendant was attracted to the matter, in favor of mere bail as a mere and only bounty and was not unnecessarily detained for more than six months. H was behind bars, it was admitted on bail to a former criminal court was told that, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
