PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR DISTRICT LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD LATIF
Suit for Revenue Record of Declaration in Section 42 of the IQE Property (Multiple Allotment) Act (VII of 1957), Section 22 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), O XVII, R 3 suit, which is vacant after Pakistan and its independence. The landlord was shown with the suit land. Claims of emigrant of India claiming to be the owner of the land on the basis of the sale deeds executed in his favor in the year 1945 46 under the decree of the deputy Muslim country of the illegitimate owner. , The case was confirmed by the Custodian that the suit was a non-vacant property, but the plaintiff's ownership of the plaintiff's deposition was modified by the subordinate's deputy supervisor and custodian plates by the decedent. The affirmation is that the plaintiff has obtained such orders from trial to trial by trial. Because the government had not presented evidence of the defendant the plaintiff had confirmed this. Appellate Court affirmation that agricultural property could be transferred by mutation in the years 1945 46 There was nothing available to show why the plaintiff was remaining silent until the 1945 1947 until 1947 till 1947 and in the year 4545 suit45. 46. The plaintiff did not submit to the khasra gurdwari when he showed his possession of the suit land after his purchase. The suit land was shown in the Revenue Record, Will have special property. The evicted owner became the property of the central government through the operation of the law.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
