Find a Lawyer

ABDUL AZIZ versus STATE

Article 2 (2 (b) / Q 34) Defining AMD Evidence The relatives of the deceased have not raised any noise nor tried to save the victim when they were dragged and beaten in the presence of the accused. The witness survived only because the silent spectators and their behavior at the scene of the scene, apart from the unusual, the eyewitnesses had improved their statements faithfully and did not speak the truth, confirming the ocular testimony through any evidence. It was not said that he was used to kill the victim but was denied on the grounds that there was no blood stain. That the perpetrator, who sustained a serious injury to the victim, cannot be believed even in the present accused, who was convicted and sentenced by the trial court on the basis of trial and speculation. The accused could not have been acquitted in the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• Rana ZILADAR KHAN v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector Sialkot 2010 YLR 1212
• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector District Lahore v. MUHAMMAD LATIF 2010 CLC 1215
• Mst. UMATUL MOBEEN v. MUHAMMAD AZIZ 2010 YLR 1216
• Mirza QAYYUM BAIG v. DILSHAD AHMAD KHAN 2010 PTD 1216
• MUHAMMAD UMAR QURESHI v. Mrs. ANJUM EHSAN 2010 YLR 1220
• Syed EJAZ HUSSAIN v. State 2010 MLD 1223
• GHULAM JANNAT v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, DERA GHAZI KHAN 2010 YLR 1227
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. State 2010 YLR 1229

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

best advocate from Vehari lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes